
A youthful appearance has long been—and continues to be—a consistently preferred trend.
When considering a person’s actual age, a face that looks at least four to five years younger can contribute to an attractive appearance.
When we look at celebrities, the younger they appear, the more we tend to feel that they take good care of themselves, creating the impression that they look even more beautiful or handsome.
Then, how can you create a youthful-looking face?
There are various conditions associated with looking youthful, but fewer problems such as under-eye wrinkles and sagging tend to create a more youthful impression.

For this reason, many people pay attention to their makeup techniques or use care methods intended to slow the progression of skin sagging in order to create a youthful-looking face.
These methods can certainly be helpful, but because they cannot eliminate the underlying cause, receiving help from a method such as Encore under-eye fat repositioning may ultimately provide a true solution for achieving a clear, noticeable result.
For those interested in this, today Ainique will explain the comparison, features, and surgical technique of Encore under-eye fat repositioning.

Problems around the eyes tend to develop faster than those affecting other areas of the skin and can occur even at a relatively young age.
This may be because the skin itself is thin and delicate, the face undergoes various changes during daily life—such as smiling or frowning—and some people are born with excessive under-eye fat or experience faster aging than their actual age would suggest.

A comparison shows that Encore under-eye fat repositioning differs from the conventional method.
The method commonly performed in the past involved surgically removing fat that had sagged or formed wrinkles beneath the eyes, thereby flattening the under-eye area.
Because the sagging fat was removed, the under-eye area could become taut. However, because the procedure altered the structure that was naturally present, there was a higher risk of problems such as increased bleeding and inflammation or prolonged swelling.

To reduce the incidence of these problems, Ainique conducted comparisons and research on Encore under-eye fat repositioning and uses a differentiated method.
Under-eye fat repositioning differs from the method that is commonly performed.
There is a difference in the procedure itself. When considering the various Encore under-eye fat repositioning methods, Ainique’s method is characterized by reducing tissue damage.

Rather than forcibly removing the problem beneath the eyes, the focus is on using it and repositioning it.
The key focus here is the fat capsule, or fat pocket, called the SAC.
The capsule is opened to expose the fat, which is then separated and spread evenly beneath the eyes to create a smooth, flat contour.

Another advantage of Ainique’s Encore under-eye fat repositioning method is the use of a low-trauma laser.

This method uses a high-end laser device from the U.S. company Lumenis. With just one laser application, it can more efficiently separate and dissect the fatty tissue in the surgical area.
In particular, it can precisely separate the spaces between tissues while helping reduce damage to surrounding blood vessels and normal tissue. This means it has the advantage of not requiring unnecessarily repeated applications.
As a result, it may reduce bleeding during surgery and the burden of tissue irritation, while also helping alleviate bruising and swelling and supporting a more stable recovery process.
Because the extent of surgical dissection can be reduced, tissue damage is minimized, and the device is also advantageous for shortening recovery time when compared with Encore under-eye fat repositioning methods.

Today, together with Ainique, we explained the comparison between conventional under-eye surgery and Encore under-eye fat repositioning.
If you would like a detailed consultation, please click the channel link below.
Thank you.

